http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/3d-grid-simulation-matters Support for the k-Wave MATLAB toolbox en-US Wed, 13 May 2026 00:04:24 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://www.k-wave.org/forum/search.php http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/3d-grid-simulation-matters#post-4618 Mon, 07 Jul 2014 10:32:28 +0000 Anthony 4618@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/ <p>Hi jing0008,</p> <p>You should have a look at the C++ code (see chapter 4 of k-wave users'manual): it is considerably faster.</p> <p>Anthony </p> http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/3d-grid-simulation-matters#post-4616 Mon, 07 Jul 2014 03:57:03 +0000 jing0008 4616@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/ <p>Hello!<br /> First of all thanks a lot for this handy toolbox! It's really helpful.<br /> I'm currently working on a 3D simulation program. The space I want to simulate contains a wave source(pulse wave), a curved reflector(to a focus point) and homogeneous medium(nonlinear). It turned out that I can only go with 64*64*64 grid and it's still very slow(running the program).<br /> The command I'm using is KspaceFirstOrder3D.<br /> However right now 64*64*64 might not be accurate enuff. So is there any way I can make a larger grid with acceptable running time? </p>