<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>k-Wave User Forum &#187; Topic: Absorption in pstdElastic2D</title>
		<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/absorption-in-pstdelastic2d</link>
		<description>Support for the k-Wave MATLAB toolbox</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 23:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.k-wave.org/forum/rss/topic/absorption-in-pstdelastic2d" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>elliotP on "Absorption in pstdElastic2D"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/absorption-in-pstdelastic2d#post-7266</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 23:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>elliotP</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7266@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Dr. Treeby,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thank you for your suggestion. Actually, I think there are different numbers for attenuation and approaches for the skull simulations. For example, the skull is modeled as a uniform medium in one of your papers which you used shear attenuation 19.5 dB/(MHz^2 cm) and compressional attenuation 8.83 dB/(MHz^2 cm).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Best,&#60;br /&#62;
Michael
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bradley Treeby on "Absorption in pstdElastic2D"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/absorption-in-pstdelastic2d#post-7258</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 11:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradley Treeby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7258@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Yes, that seems correct if you can assume an f^2 frequency dependence. Note, the value of 13.3 dB/cm is for the total attenuation (including scattering). If you want to use the Pinton values in &#60;code&#62;pstdElastic2D&#60;/code&#62;, I would suggest using the actual absorption values, which are 2.7 dB/cm for the compression absorption and 5.4 dB/cm for the shear absorption.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>elliotP on "Absorption in pstdElastic2D"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/absorption-in-pstdelastic2d#post-7254</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 07:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>elliotP</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7254@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi all,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;In the paper below, bone attenuation is measured 13.3 dB/cm at 1 MHz. I want to use this attenuation value in pstdElastic2D simulation which attenuation unit is dB/(MHz^2 cm). So, I divided 13.3 by 1^2 and I got 13.3 dB/(MHz^2 cm). &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Do you think it is a correct way to get the attenuation from the dB/cm unit? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Best,&#60;br /&#62;
Michael&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;[1]Pinton, Gianmarco, et al. &#34;Attenuation, scattering, and absorption of ultrasound in the skull bone.&#34; Medical physics 39.1 (2012): 299-307.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
