<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>k-Wave User Forum &#187; Topic: Asymmetrical velocity vector</title>
		<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/asymmetrical-velocity-vector</link>
		<description>Support for the k-Wave MATLAB toolbox</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.k-wave.org/forum/rss/topic/asymmetrical-velocity-vector" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Bradley Treeby on "Asymmetrical velocity vector"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/asymmetrical-velocity-vector#post-971</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 01:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradley Treeby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">971@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Erik,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The offsets you see are due to the staggered grid scheme that is used in k-Wave (you can find some more details &#60;a href=&#34;http://asadl.org/jasa/resource/1/jasman/v111/i1/p53_s1&#34;&#62;here&#60;/a&#62;). In 2D, the x-components of the particle velocity are calculated at positions (x + dx/2, y), and the y-components are calculated at positions (x, y + dy/2). If you want an estimate of the particle velocity on the non-staggered grid points, one approach would be to record the values at two neighbouring points and use interpolation. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Hope that helps,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Brad.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>styxed on "Asymmetrical velocity vector"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/asymmetrical-velocity-vector#post-960</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>styxed</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">960@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hello,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I have a problem working in 2D with the &#60;code&#62;&#38;#39;ReturnVelocity&#38;#39;&#60;/code&#62; option.&#60;br /&#62;
I have a single source point at &#60;code&#62;(x,y)&#60;/code&#62; with a certain &#60;code&#62;source.p0&#60;/code&#62;. Two sensor points are placed at &#60;code&#62;(x, y-d)&#60;/code&#62; and &#60;code&#62;(x, y+d)&#60;/code&#62; with d=10 or whatever.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;As expected, the pressure in the two sensor points are exactly the same. Since the setup has been made symmetrically, I would also want the velocity vector in the y-direction to be the same (but opposite). But they are not, because I think the velocity at point &#60;code&#62;(X, Y)&#60;/code&#62; is calculated with the difference in pressure between points &#60;code&#62;(X, Y)&#60;/code&#62; and &#60;code&#62;(X+1, Y)&#60;/code&#62; (for &#60;code&#62;sensor_data.ux&#60;/code&#62;), right?. For example the velocity vector at &#60;code&#62;(x, y-d)&#60;/code&#62; and &#60;code&#62;(x, y+d-1)&#60;/code&#62; &#38;lt;b&#38;gt;are&#38;lt;/b&#38;gt; the same.&#60;br /&#62;
Is there a 'neat solution' for this issue by for example using the pressure in points &#60;code&#62;(X-1, Y)&#60;/code&#62; and &#60;code&#62;(X+1, Y)&#60;/code&#62; in kspaceFirstOrder2D?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Erik
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
