<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>k-Wave User Forum &#187; Topic: Equivalent Source Holography for 1D Measured Data</title>
		<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/equivalent-source-holography-for-1d-measured-data</link>
		<description>Support for the k-Wave MATLAB toolbox</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.k-wave.org/forum/rss/topic/equivalent-source-holography-for-1d-measured-data" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Bradley Treeby on "Equivalent Source Holography for 1D Measured Data"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/equivalent-source-holography-for-1d-measured-data#post-7797</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 19:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradley Treeby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7797@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Khan,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;In principle, you could run a similar type of optimisation, but I don't imagine it will be very well posed as you will be trying to fit a large number of unknowns (amplitude and phase or driving signal over a plane) with only a small amount of measurement data.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;As an aside, running the simulations in 2D only makes sense if your experimental geometry is 2D (e.g., you have a transducer that is very large in the out of plane direction).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;An alternative approach would be to setup an equivalent transducer (e.g., using a bowl if your transducer is bowl shaped, etc), and then run a simple optimisation over the transducer properties, e.g., radius of curvature, aperture diameter, etc. This problem will be much better posed as you will be fitting only a small number of parameters to your data. You could perform the optimisation using the inbuilt MATLAB routines which are relatively straightforward to use.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Hope that helps,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Brad.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hko on "Equivalent Source Holography for 1D Measured Data"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/equivalent-source-holography-for-1d-measured-data#post-7772</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hko</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7772@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hello,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I was wondering if it is possible to use calculateMassSourceCW with the measured data given as a 1D matrix of complex pressure values. For instance, if I only have the azimuth beam profile (1D) measured for a linear array, can I calculate the equivalent source, which would give me the amplitude and phase of each element in the array? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I have tried to modify the &#34;Equivalent Source Holography Example&#34; by simulating the measured data using kspaceFirstOrder2D with no luck yet. I wanted to know if I am missing anything before I continue.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thank you in advance,&#60;br /&#62;
Khan
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
