<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>k-Wave User Forum &#187; Topic: Far field simulation</title>
		<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/far-field-simulation</link>
		<description>Support for the k-Wave MATLAB toolbox</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.k-wave.org/forum/rss/topic/far-field-simulation" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Bradley Treeby on "Far field simulation"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/far-field-simulation#post-8381</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 11:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradley Treeby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8381@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Marco,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;There is no way in k-Wave at least to directly compute the far-field without running the wave through the intervening grid points. One possibility might be to use another tool or analytical expression, and then input this into k-Wave across a plane as a Dirichlet boundary condition.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Brad.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>inzunzam.marco on "Far field simulation"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/far-field-simulation#post-8303</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 16:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>inzunzam.marco</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8303@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Bradley, &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I have a question regarding a PA source in 2D. I noticed that I need to place a source (say a 100 micron disc) far in the field so that I get the correct reconstructed (DAS) image from a linear array of sensors. The reconstruction becomes distorted the closer I place the source in space to the sensor array.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This makes my grid size and computation time significantly large.  Is there any way to setup the simulation with the far field condition so that I can reduce the grid points between my source/receivers?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thank you,&#60;br /&#62;
Marco
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bradley Treeby on "Far field simulation"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/far-field-simulation#post-6155</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradley Treeby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6155@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Alessandro,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Do you mean numerically? If so, then this would be possible using k-Wave. I'd suggest working through the examples and the k-Wave manual. After that, it should be clear how to set up a simulation with a line detector (if it's infinite, you could use a point detector in 2D).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Brad.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlessandroPolo on "Far field simulation"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/far-field-simulation#post-6148</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 13:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>AlessandroPolo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6148@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Everyone!&#60;br /&#62;
I was wondering if there is a way to compute the acoustic far field from an acoustic pressure collected by a line detector.&#60;br /&#62;
Does anyone have an answer to that?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;regards&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Alessandro
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
