<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>k-Wave User Forum &#187; Topic: focused field example is innacurate?</title>
		<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/focused-field-example-is-innacurate</link>
		<description>Support for the k-Wave MATLAB toolbox</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 23:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.k-wave.org/forum/rss/topic/focused-field-example-is-innacurate" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Bradley Treeby on "focused field example is innacurate?"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/focused-field-example-is-innacurate#post-5876</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradley Treeby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5876@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Andrew,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Glad you managed to figure it out!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Brad.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ad000000 on "focused field example is innacurate?"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/focused-field-example-is-innacurate#post-5869</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ad000000</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5869@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Oops.  Now I see.  It's because the makeCircle command is entered in units of grid points.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ad000000 on "focused field example is innacurate?"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/focused-field-example-is-innacurate#post-5868</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ad000000</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5868@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;p.s. my full name is Andrew Draudt
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ad000000 on "focused field example is innacurate?"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/focused-field-example-is-innacurate#post-5867</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ad000000</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5867@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Thanks Brad.   Oh yeah, 2-d.&#60;br /&#62;
What about the change caused by increase in Nx and Ny?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks for the paper link.  Interesting - the H101 was the same transducer I modeled a lot in my grad work.&#60;br /&#62;
-Andy
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bradley Treeby on "focused field example is innacurate?"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/focused-field-example-is-innacurate#post-5866</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradley Treeby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5866@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Andy,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This example is in 2D, so you will get a different field compared to the O'Neil solution. An arc in 2D is equivalent to a cylindrically focused rectangle in 3D (think of the arc infinitely extended out of the page).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;If you define a focused bowl, k-Wave should give very good agreement. See &#60;a href=&#34;http://bug.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/papers/2016-Martin-IEEETUFFC.pdf&#34;&#62;this paper&#60;/a&#62; for an example which compares k-Wave with the O'Neil solution and experimental measurements made using a focused bowl transducer.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Brad.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ad000000 on "focused field example is innacurate?"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/focused-field-example-is-innacurate#post-5864</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 20:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ad000000</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5864@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;p.s.   why does increasing Nx and Ny change the field shape on this example?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ad000000 on "focused field example is innacurate?"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/focused-field-example-is-innacurate#post-5863</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 20:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ad000000</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5863@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi.  This software looks so promising!  Thanks.&#60;br /&#62;
However, when I calculated the true field pattern (using O'Neil's method, for example) of the transducer in the example &#34;Simulating transducer field patterns&#34; , I get a field with far more lobes and nearfield maxima (and less strong) than the K-Wave results.   Also,  the K-Wave output shows maxima and minima on the surface of the transducer - where it is supposed to be constant.&#60;br /&#62;
Any insights would be appreciated!&#60;br /&#62;
Thanks,&#60;br /&#62;
Andy
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
