<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>k-Wave User Forum &#187; Topic: High frequencies are not aliased but instead compressed together?</title>
		<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/high-frequencies-are-not-aliased-but-instead-compressed-together</link>
		<description>Support for the k-Wave MATLAB toolbox</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 22:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.k-wave.org/forum/rss/topic/high-frequencies-are-not-aliased-but-instead-compressed-together" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Bradley Treeby on "High frequencies are not aliased but instead compressed together?"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/high-frequencies-are-not-aliased-but-instead-compressed-together#post-7599</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradley Treeby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7599@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi gk7,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Ok, it is likely related to spectral blocking then. Does your simulation have any absorption? If not, you could try adding some.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Brad.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gk7 on "High frequencies are not aliased but instead compressed together?"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/high-frequencies-are-not-aliased-but-instead-compressed-together#post-7585</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 00:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gk7</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7585@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Yes, high frequencies (&#38;gt; 95 MHz) appear when I set medium.BonA and they disappear when I don't set them.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bradley Treeby on "High frequencies are not aliased but instead compressed together?"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/high-frequencies-are-not-aliased-but-instead-compressed-together#post-7567</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2020 18:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradley Treeby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7567@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi gk7,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Just to confirm, the high frequencies &#38;gt;95 MHz appear / disappear when you set / don't set medium.BonA?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Brad.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gk7 on "High frequencies are not aliased but instead compressed together?"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/high-frequencies-are-not-aliased-but-instead-compressed-together#post-7532</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 15:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gk7</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7532@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Bradley,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I checked out the linear spectrum. As you suspected, it's flat except the main lobe at 1 MHz without high frequencies. How do I need to define the source to obtain proper results with nonlinear simulations?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bradley Treeby on "High frequencies are not aliased but instead compressed together?"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/high-frequencies-are-not-aliased-but-instead-compressed-together#post-7515</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 11:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradley Treeby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7515@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi gk7,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Could you try running your simulation under linear conditions (don't define &#60;code&#62;medium.BonA&#60;/code&#62;) to see if you still see the high frequencies? It could be related to your source definition rather than the nonlinearity. You have a very flat spectrum before the high-frequency peak, which doesn't immediately look like spectral blocking.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Brad.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gk7 on "High frequencies are not aliased but instead compressed together?"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/high-frequencies-are-not-aliased-but-instead-compressed-together#post-7470</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2020 00:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gk7</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7470@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I'm running the &#34;Modelling Nonlinear Wave Propagation Example&#34; in Matlab with a time varying source that produces linear sine sweep centered at 1 MHz and spanning 0.9 MHz. I want to see the higher order harmonics so I set up the time and grid parameters so that I have 674 MHz sampling rate and 101 MHz maximum supported frequency. When I look at the resulting spectrum of the sensor data, I see bunch of frequencies are squished around 95-101 MHz. Please see this link (&#60;a href=&#34;https://imgur.com/a/71uxjbq&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;https://imgur.com/a/71uxjbq&#60;/a&#62; ) for the spectrum. To my understanding, aliasing doesn't seem to explain this. I'd still expect a decreasing pattern in higher frequencies even if they were aliased. Am I missing something? What could the reason be?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
