<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>k-Wave User Forum &#187; Topic: Is PML still effective in low frequency</title>
		<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/is-pml-still-effective-in-low-frequency-1</link>
		<description>Support for the k-Wave MATLAB toolbox</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 23:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.k-wave.org/forum/rss/topic/is-pml-still-effective-in-low-frequency-1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>lyz2001 on "Is PML still effective in low frequency"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/is-pml-still-effective-in-low-frequency-1#post-9137</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2024 05:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lyz2001</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">9137@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi,everyone&#60;br /&#62;
As we all know, PML is used to weaken the spatial aliasing effect.But it seems dosen't work on low frequency(500Hz-1kHz),no matter the thickness of the PML&#60;br /&#62;
For example, if I put a source on the left side of the grid（140dB）， and set a very thick PML（&#38;gt;200points）,there is still sound waves from the right side of the grid in the beginning of the simulation,which doesn't agree with the absorption ability in the k-Wave manual.&#60;br /&#62;
So I want to ask is PML still effective in low frequency.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Lyz2001
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
