<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>k-Wave User Forum &#187; Topic: Plane wave simulation, commercial probe</title>
		<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/plane-wave-simulation-commercial-probe</link>
		<description>Support for the k-Wave MATLAB toolbox</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 23:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.k-wave.org/forum/rss/topic/plane-wave-simulation-commercial-probe" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Bradley Treeby on "Plane wave simulation, commercial probe"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/plane-wave-simulation-commercial-probe#post-6893</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 20:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradley Treeby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6893@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Farnazkhj,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;1. Yes, if you set the focus point to a large distance, you will get an unfocused transmit.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;2. As long as the transducer is not within the PML, you can set Nz to be a small number. The only downside is that you might not capture the complete out-of-plane behaviour, although the effect on the image is likely to be very small.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;3. Keep in mind a simulation in 2D is different to 3D (e.g., a point source in 2D corresponds to an infinite line source in 3D, so will spherical spreading will be less than a point source in 3D). If you can live with that, 2D will certainly be faster. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Brad
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Farnaz on "Plane wave simulation, commercial probe"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/plane-wave-simulation-commercial-probe#post-6850</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 12:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Farnaz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6850@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi, &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I am new to k-wave and have some questions, I'm trying to simulate a commercial ultrasound transducer with 128 elements which 64 elements of it are activated in a plane wave scenario. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;1- If I set the focus point to inf (or very large values) when I am defining transducer parameters will I have plane wave? If not, how I can simulate plane wave for a commercial probe then? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;2- Based on the pitch and kerf parameters I need at least 1024 grid points in x and y direction (only for the transducer probe face)(3.75 cm probe 4 grid point for piezo and extra 4 grid points for kerf). The whole medium is then 4.24*4.24 cm and the probe plane is located just outside the PML. The same transducer will be used as sensor to record the data.&#60;br /&#62;
As the transducer class only works in 3D mode, these many grid points are computationally expensive, what happens if I set Nz to a very small number  while maintaining dz=dx=dy (say Nz = 16,32, etc...)? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;3- If this is not possible to do what are your suggestions for my simulation? Should I use 2D simulation and set everything manually instead of using transducer class? (BTW i'm using 3D c++ version for CUDA but I run it in MATLAB (I have a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti))
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
