<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>k-Wave User Forum &#187; Topic: Slow reflection ampitude convergence and improvement suggestion</title>
		<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/slow-reflection-ampitude-convergence-and-improvement-suggestion</link>
		<description>Support for the k-Wave MATLAB toolbox</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.k-wave.org/forum/rss/topic/slow-reflection-ampitude-convergence-and-improvement-suggestion" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>bencox on "Slow reflection ampitude convergence and improvement suggestion"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/slow-reflection-ampitude-convergence-and-improvement-suggestion#post-8503</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 19:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bencox</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8503@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Jan-Willem,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This is interesting. Did you get to the bottom of this behaviour? We tried something similar with the sound speed previously but it didn't improve matters. There's a discussion of the convergence of the reflection coefficient with the usual set-up in this paper&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;a href=&#34;https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4712021&#34;&#62;https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4712021&#60;/a&#62;.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Best wishes&#60;br /&#62;
Ben
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jw on "Slow reflection ampitude convergence and improvement suggestion"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/slow-reflection-ampitude-convergence-and-improvement-suggestion#post-8460</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jw</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8460@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;First of all, thank you for actively developing k-Wave and maintaining this forum.&#60;br /&#62;
I would like to simulate realistic speckle in 2D/3D B-mode ultrasound images (7.6 MHz centre freq., 75% bandwidth). To to this, I added Gaussian noise to the density field. Next, I performed a convergence study (no attenuation, constant SOS of 1500 m/s) and noticed that the SNR of the simulated speckle converged very slowly. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;To find the cause, I simplified the model by using a centre frequency of 1 Mhz in 1D. Instead of speckle, I simulated a discontinuous transition by prescribing a steep increase in the density field (from 1000 to 1100). I recorded the reflection of the wave and determined the maximum amplitude, for various grid spacings (between 5-150 um, which corresponds to 300-10 points per wavelength at the centre freq.).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The max. amplitude converges to the analytical solution (dashed line), although very slowly, see Figure 1. In an attempt to improve convergence, I tried to describe a band-limited discontinuous transition, using the rectangular function (sampled in the Fourier domain using the sinc function). This however, did not improve convergence, see Figure 2.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;As I did not expect these results, I decided to have a look at k-Wave's code itself.&#60;br /&#62;
I noticed that the inverted rho_0 field was interpolated to the staggered grid using linear interpolation. I expected that a band-limited interpolation would be more accurate for band-limited signals, and I implemented this interpolation within k-Wave's code. I redid the convergence study with this modified code, and noticed the maximum reflection amplitude converged much faster with the band-limited discontinuous transition (convergence at already ~150 um). &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This leads me to the following questions. Is this slow convergence for reflected waves typical, and are there other ways to improve it? Is the band-limited interpolation for the inverted rho_0 field a valid approach?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I would appreciate hearing your opinion on this.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Jan-Willem Muller&#60;br /&#62;
PhD candidate, PULS/e group, Eindhoven University of Technology&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Figure 1:&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;img src=&#34;https://i.imgur.com/JjHmSiV.jpeg&#34; /&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Figure 2:&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;img src=&#34;https://i.imgur.com/6d41l2t.jpeg&#34; /&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Download figures:&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;a href=&#34;https://imgur.com/a/YbDi3hc&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;https://imgur.com/a/YbDi3hc&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
