<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>k-Wave User Forum &#187; Topic: The relationship between frequency and attenuation.</title>
		<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/the-relationship-between-frequency-and-attenuation</link>
		<description>Support for the k-Wave MATLAB toolbox</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 09:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.k-wave.org/forum/rss/topic/the-relationship-between-frequency-and-attenuation" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Bradley Treeby on "The relationship between frequency and attenuation."</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/the-relationship-between-frequency-and-attenuation#post-7406</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradley Treeby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7406@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi wang_feng_2020,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Unfortunately, it's impossible to say without seeing the rest of your code. One comment, attenuations on the order of -80 dB are very large, and about the same performance as the PML used in k-Wave. It's possible that you've reached the noise floor.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Brad.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>wang_feng_2020 on "The relationship between frequency and attenuation."</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/the-relationship-between-frequency-and-attenuation#post-7369</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>wang_feng_2020</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7369@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi,Brad.&#60;br /&#62;
Here is my code:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;% muscle&#60;br /&#62;
medium.sound_speed = 1588 * ones(Nx,Ny);   % [m/s]&#60;br /&#62;
medium.density = 1090 * ones(Nx, Ny);       % [kg/m^3]&#60;br /&#62;
medium.alpha_coeff = 0.6*ones(Nx,Ny);  % [dB/(MHz^y cm)]&#60;br /&#62;
medium.BonA = 7.8*ones(Nx,Ny);&#60;br /&#62;
medium.alpha_power =1.2;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Theoretically, the higher the frequency of the source, the greater the attenuation factor.&#60;br /&#62;
When the frequency of the source is 1MHz, the attenuation is -82dB. When the frequency of the source is 2MHz, the attenuation is -76dB.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This is the opposite of the theoretical calculation,Why does this happen?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
