<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>k-Wave User Forum &#187; Topic: Ultrasound heating and Intensity</title>
		<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/ultrasound-heating-and-intensity</link>
		<description>Support for the k-Wave MATLAB toolbox</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 22:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.k-wave.org/forum/rss/topic/ultrasound-heating-and-intensity" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>bencox on "Ultrasound heating and Intensity"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/ultrasound-heating-and-intensity#post-8624</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 14:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bencox</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8624@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi s148275, &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;You could output the intensity directly using &#60;code&#62;sensor.record = {&#38;#39;I_avg&#38;#39;}&#60;/code&#62; or &#60;code&#62;... = {&#38;#39;I&#38;#39;}&#60;/code&#62;. The 2 comes from the fact that the absorption coefficient for intensity is twice the pressure absorption coefficient (which is the one usually quoted) when they are given in Nepers/m.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Interestingly, they are the same if given in dB/m as the definition of the decibel for the intensity uses 10log_10 and for the pressure is 20log_10.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Best wishes&#60;br /&#62;
Ben
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>s148275 on "Ultrasound heating and Intensity"</title>
			<link>http://www.k-wave.org/forum/topic/ultrasound-heating-and-intensity#post-8617</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2022 14:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>s148275</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8617@http://www.k-wave.org/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I am a bit confused about the equation that needs to be used for the heating rate Q. From my simulation I get the outputs: &#60;code&#62;sensor_data.p&#60;/code&#62;, &#60;code&#62;sensor_data.ux_non_staggered&#60;/code&#62; and &#60;code&#62;sensor_data.uy_non_staggered&#60;/code&#62;. The following code is used to get the average intensity:&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;pre&#62;&#60;code&#62;ux_sgt = fourierShift(sensor_data.ux_non_staggered, 1/2)
uy_sgt = fourierShift(sensor_data.uy_non_staggered, 1/2)
Ix = sensor_data.p .* ux_sgt
Iy = sensor_data.p .* uy_sgt
I = sqrt(Ix^2+Iy^2)
I_avg = mean(I, ndims(I))&#60;/code&#62;&#60;/pre&#62;
&#60;p&#62;If I want to find the heat deposition Q, what is the equation that I need to use? For now I am using:&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;pre&#62;&#60;code&#62;alpha_np = db2neper(alpha_coeff_p_db,alpha_power) ...
* (2 * pi * f0).^alpha_power;
Q = alpha_np .* I_avg;&#60;/code&#62;&#60;/pre&#62;
&#60;p&#62;However, sometimes &#60;code&#62;Q=2*alpha_np*I_avg&#60;/code&#62; is used. What is the case here and why?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks in advance!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
